Review of Africa Blogs
http://www.pambazuka.org/images/articles/329/blogs_01_crossedcrocodiles… of the leading topics on the African blogosphere this week is AFRICOM, the United States Africa Command. reflects the general mood among African bloggers with his argument that AFRICOM has no place in Africa:
“I don't think the greatest immediate danger posed by AFRICOM is from US soldiers and sailors. One of the things that worries me is that I suspect the mercenaries and mercenary corporations are what the US plans to use in Africa, in addition to training African military as US surrogates. These mercenaries may be employees of the US State Department, or some other US government department, as they are in Iraq. Or they may be the employees of giant corporations, such as oil companies. Whatever US objectives, arms and mercenaries can only destabilize. The presence of actual US military personnel may just be window dressing. The dirty work will be done by private armies and private CIAs. Already in the US these are taking over the functions of the military and intelligence. I am hoping a change in US administration may change the direction of this trend, but there are no guarantees.
http://www.pambazuka.org/images/articles/329/blogs_02_africa-speaks.gif… view is shared by Africa Speaks who argues that:
“What Africa needs least is U.S. military expansion on the continent (and elsewhere in the world). What Africa needs most is its own mechanism to respond to peacemaking priorities. Fifty years ago, Kwame Nkrumah sounded the clarion call for a “United States of Africa.” One central feature of his call was for an Africa Military High Command. Today, as the African Union deliberates continental governance, there couldn’t be a better time to reject U.S. military expansion and push forward African responses to Africa’s priorities.
Long suffering the effects of militaristic "assistance" from the United States, Liberia would be the worst possible base for AFRICOM. But there are no good locations for such a poorly conceived project. Africa does not need AFRICOM.”
http://www.pambazuka.org/images/articles/329/blogs_03_liberiaandfriends…Liberia and Friends blog however, takes a diametrically opposed view and insists that AFRICOM is good not only for Africa but specifically for Liberia:
“Why is it that so many African powers are against the United States setting up its African command on African soil? The answer is simple, African nations, at least those run by dictators, like Zimbabwe's Robert Mugabe, don't want more Americans, and their democratic ideas, upsetting the status quo…”
It then goes on to make the case for AFRICOM setting up its headquarters in Liberia:
“… coming out of almost two decades of civil war, and with our infrastructure, and economy in shambles… several hundred, or even thousands, of well paid American soldiers and civilians, would work wonders for the economy. And not to mention the huge financial incentive and the creation of thousands of jobs that would come with Africom requests for basing rights.
Another reason we Liberians should welcome Africom is because it would give pause to any future rebel group, or military commanders contemplating a coup.”
http://www.pambazuka.org/images/articles/329/blogs_04_pickinjava.gifSti… on the issue of security and western involvement in Africa, Pickin Java explains how western business and political interests use two myths to control oil in the Gulf of Guinea:
1. Business myth: "We are not involved in politics. We just make profits for our shareholders through managing the oil." Reality: Shell and other companies have been intimately involved with Nigerian state figures in creating the type of instability amenable to Shell's control of petroleum production, in order to suck the region dry and thus enrich elite political/economic/military 'shareholders'.
2. Military myth: ". . . in general, U.S. policymakers tend to be extremely well educated and dedicated professionals, earnestly working to advance U.S. interests. . . political and economic freedom, peaceful relations with other states, and respect for human dignity. . ."
Matthew V. Sousa and James J. F. Forest, Oil and Terrorism in the New Gulf: Framing U.S. Energy and Security Policies (Lexington Books, 2006), p. 148-149.
Because the Gulf is filled with dangerous terrorists and criminals that are against everything earnest U.S. policymakers believe in, it is important to prop up strong states with strong militaries to fight this menace. Reality: Provide the steel hand on which the velvet glove of business and politics can be worn. "Terrorists" are those who oppose Shell's, BPs and others' corporate interests.”
Pickin Java concludes by asking “How long until the U.S. finds the right kind of Musharraf for Nigeria?
http://www.pambazuka.org/images/articles/329/blogs_05_africaflak.gifAfrikaflak tackles another contentious issue, China’s growing economic influence in Africa:
What the Chinese seem to have done [is to] directly cultivate the people – you know, regular Africans. They’re building roads, bridges, buildings, railroads… The Chinese have most likely banked a lot of goodwill this way: ameliorating the standard of living for run-of-the-mill Africans, those people who never feel the direct benefits of debt relief or well catered Friendship Summits or satellites in orbit.
…
The Chinese offer Africans something real and concrete while American (and to a lesser extent, European) promises are abstract, remote even: democracy, participatory government, rule of law – whatever you want to call it. The U.S. says, if you follow through on the first goals, the good stuff will follow. Later. Maybe much later.
The Chinese appeal to Africans’ base needs. This translates simply: If you have enough plastic crap, you won’t care about what junk the Americans peddle. In the end, everyone is happy: the stalwarts who get to remain in power; the family with their new tools to make their lives a little easier; and, the guy at the end of the street schlepping this stuff.”
http://www.pambazuka.org/images/articles/329/blogs_06_thiswayplease.gifwww.dibussi.com