Developing country governments were continuing to service illegitimate debts that could not be paid without causing enormous human harm, Leslie Fields from Friends of the Earth International told a Global People's Forum meeting on debt eradication during the World Summit on Sustainable Development (WSSD).

People from across the world - mainly from Africa - stood up in front of thousands at a meeting on corporate accountability at the World Summit on Sustainable Development (WSSD) and faced the television cameras to voice their anger at how the negative impacts of globalisation resulted in their continued poverty and disempowerment.

Naomi Ngwira cannot understand why the whole of Africa can’t survive without Coca-Cola. Speaking at a meeting to discuss global governance and corruption at the Global People’s Forum, a parallel event held at the same time as the World Summit on Sustainable Development, Ngwira asked why more concerted action wasn’t taken against the United States, International Monetary Fund and World Bank over their harmful policies. “Is it really the case that we can’t do anything about the US, IMF and World Bank?” she asked, “Can’t we begin to impose sanctions on the United States?”

There is growing concern that globalisation threatens the ability of developing countries to address social policy concerns. Is there a need for a global regulatory framework to protect social rights? Should the international financial institutions (IFI) be getting involved in social policy or would a new institution to deal with social policy be more likely to win support?

A U.N. plan to cut poverty while saving the earth's resources agreed on last Wednesday includes measures to replenish fish stocks and slow the rate at which rare species of plants and animals are being wiped out. Many leading scientists and the United Nations itself have painted a gloomy picture of the planet's future. Some experts say up to 50 percent of the world's species could be wiped out by human activity in this century.

Recent studies show that many children in developing countries are leaving school without learning to read, write or do basic sums. The Global Campaign for Education argues that this is an injustice and a waste of human potential that must be challenged. Improving the quality of public education is also one of the fundamental actions - along with expanding access and abolishing fees and charges - needed to achieve the 2015 goal of universal completion of primary school.

A credible strategy now exists to get every child into school. But the strategy will be worthless unless it is backed by major additional resources from G8 countries. New figures show that aid for basic education remains dismally low. The Global Campaign for Education argues in a new paper that it is time for the G8 to move beyond public relations gimmicks and produce a real breakthrough for the world's poor.

The International Federation of Journalists (IFJ) has called for a global commitment on press freedom to emerge from the World Summit on Sustainable Development (WSSD), warning that the aims of the Summit will not be achieved without a commitment to human rights.

Some corporations continue to abuse the rights of people, destroy the livelihoods of communities, and pollute water and forest resources for future generations, according to a new report by Friends of the Earth International. The report graphically illustrates the need for governments to agree to introduce tighter rules for multinationals at the Earth Summit in Johannesburg.

The world's governments, facing a deteriorating planet, are making a last ditch effort to save the Earth. The industrialized countries of the North and the developing countries of the South are scrambling to reach a global deal that will combine environmental protection and poverty alleviation. But a group of global corporations are claiming that they have the answers to the planet's environment and development woes and suggest redefining "sustainable development" to focus on "profit, planet and people." George Bush, President of the United States, sides with the corporate approach. Is the year 1992 or 2002? Take your pick.

Mining is one of the planet’s leading polluters, with most new mining development taking place in some of the world’s most ecologically fragile regions. Yet mining has not proven beneficial to local communities or national economies over the long term.

The World Summit on Sustainable Development (WSSD) will be held in Johannesburg beginning on August 24, proceeded by various civil society conferences and events. Its purported aim is to find a common international discourse, strategies and tactics that allow governments, business and civil society to eradicate poverty, end unsustainable patterns of consumption and production, and combat environmental degradation. But will it flop?

Host president Thabo Mbeki's New Partnership for Africa's Development (NEPAD) is one of the main agenda items, having recently gone through official state endorsement processes at both the June summit of the G-8 leaders in Alberta, Canada, and the July launch of the Africa Union in Durban. Pronounced "knee-pad" by many civil society advocates, the "Partnership" may be a shot-gun wedding forcing the rest of the continent to its knees, bowing to the whims and demands of proto-capitalists, like Finance Minister Trevor Manuel and his Pretoria cronies.

The WSSD will also be the site of a mass anti-capitalist march on August 31, although there are two major camps on the South African left claiming the tradition of the World Social Forum. Regardless of whether a labour/church-backed pro-government grouping--the Civil Society Forum--continues to crowd out the independent-left Civil Society Indaba, the WSSD will not be left unscathed. The latter group has the support of urban anti-privatisation and rural landless people's organisations and until February was the official UN host, before being booted out unceremoniously during internecine conflict with larger, more mainstream groups.

In addition, a variety of NGO side-events by groups like Greenpeace, Friends of the Earth International, the International Forum on Globalization, Corpwatch and many sectoral advocacy groups will keep the pressure on. Security is likely to be sufficiently tight as to prevent disruptions. As many as 100 heads of state are expected, with 60,000 other delegates, press and activists.

Even aside from civil society protest, bad content and process threaten to delegitimise the official event, as happened at the June Preparatory Committee in Bali, Indonesia. The very name "Johannesburg" may go down in infamy as the global elites' last-gasp attempt--and failure--to address a world careening out of control.

The ghosts-of-Earth-Summit-past configured Johannesburg to compromise the environment. The 1992 Rio event did establish the Rio Principles, Agenda 21, the UN Convention on Climate Change, the Convention on Biological Diversity, the Statement of Forest Principles and the Commission on Sustainable Development for implementation. Yet Rio also set in motion third-wayism--championing market solutions for securing environmental protection and promoting free trade as the sole path to sustainability.

Not surprisingly, the German Green party's Heinrich Boell Stiftung recently issued the Jo'burg Memo, which perhaps most eloquently and thoroughly summarises the criticisms of WSSD work to date. Editor Wolfgang Sachs claims that the institutional process has gone forward "without tangible global results. In particular, economic globalisation has largely washed away gains made on the micro level, spreading an exploitative economy across the globe and exposing natural resources in the South and in Russia to the pull of the world market."

Sachs credits elites with only an increase in the global surface area under environmental protection, slowing carbon emissions and declining ozone-depleting CFC production. "Apart from these cases," he continues, "the excessive strain placed by human beings on nature's sources, sites, and sinks has continued to rise. The extinction of species and habitats has increased, the destruction of ancient forests continues unabated, the degradation of fertile soil has worsened, over-fishing of oceans has continued, and the new threat of genetically engineered disruption has emerged."

In theory, the Johannesburg Summit is meant to produce a negotiated leader's statement, a negotiated plan of action and a non-negotiated list of sustainable development initiatives involving states, interstate relations, and business and civil society sectors. But few areas of consensus exist. Several alternative texts, for example, were tabled about the word "globalisation" at the end of the third PrepComm. The US proposed a positive statement, the EU suggested a balanced text, and the G-77/China insisted on a short paragraph that avoided definitions and instead focused on difficulties experienced by developing countries.

More substantive controversies continue over the role of the profit motive, "public-private partnerships" and market mechanisms in environment and development. The WSSD's main problems are its tendency to allow increasing scope for commodification of nature, its inadequate measures to address poverty and excessive wealth, and its orientation to implementation via TNCs, instead of through strengthened nation-states. The major background issue is whether the World Trade Organisation will become the default organisation and set of rules governing Multilateral Environmental Agreements.

Elite capacities to restore both the earth and the social wage have been questionable since at least the 1992 Summit. Then billionaire Maurice Strong, the conference Chairman, helped eliminate the UN Centre on Transnational Corporations, hatched the World Business Council on Sustainable Development and mapped a role for corporations to guide (un)sustainable development. Now WSSD Chairman Nitin Desai has actively blocked negotiations for a side agreement on binding Corporate Accountability, and endorsed the involvement of the newly created Business Action for Sustainable Development Group-which will have a parallel meeting in Joburg in a building adjacent to the government proceedings. Rio inaugurated the 21st century's eco-social war for the planet, the next battleground will be Johannesburg. But what the framers of corporate environmentalism did not count on then was that where there is government and corporate collusion to plunder the environment and hijack humanity, the radical forces of civil society are never too far behind.

* Bond is editor of 'Fanon's Warning: A Civil Society Reader on the New Partnership for Africa's Development' (Africa World Press, 2002) and Dorsey is Thurgood Marshall fellow at Dartmouth University, New Hampshire.

International aid agencies lack coordination when dealing with long-term assistance for internally displaced and returnee populations in the self-declared republic of Somaliland, northwestern Somalia, says a report from the United Nations Coordination Unit/Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (UNCU/OCHA).

The National Development Agency has injected more than R48-million into the province's poverty alleviation projects, with more than 18 percent of its current budget allocated to the Eastern Cape. It has also identified poverty-stricken areas, where the agency is speeding up funding.

President Bush is expected to announce that he will withhold $5.1 billion in contingency funding. The amount includes $200 million earmarked for international HIV/AIDS initiatives.

The global economy and the way of life it has created are based on the exploitation of fossil fuels – coal, oil and, more recently, natural gas – and fossil fuels will be the engine of the collapse of that economy. Without fundamental change, it has no future.

Perfect for courses on social movements since the sixties, on DIY culture, queer theory, or on anti-globalization, ‘From ACT UP to the WTO’ is a unique collection of essays from activists in a wide range of organizations that charts the profound influence of ACT UP on the style and substance of activism in the eighties and nineties and beyond. It places such events as ‘the battle for Seattle’ in important historical context – it didn’t start there! – and reveals numerous and creative forms of resistance forging ahead in many communities despite the backlash following September 11.

Relative calm has returned to western Liberia and some people who had crossed over to neighbouring Sierra Leone are gradually returning to their villages, humanitarian sources in the Liberian capital, Monrovia, said last Friday.

The economic value of wild ecosystems far outweighs the value of converting these areas to cropland, housing or other human uses. A study in the latest issue of the journal "Science" says habitat destruction costs the world the equivalent of about $250 billion each year.

Health minister Dr Manto Tshabalala Msimang sent a letter this week to the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, TB and Malaria requesting that its R720-million grant to KwaZulu-Natal be channelled through the SA National AIDS Council to be disbursed throughout the country.